Conventional arms control is critical to security in Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals. Conceived during the Cold War, the system is now being criticised for its lack of ability to change with the times, despite having proved its effectiveness in the past. Widespread renewal of conventional weapons and the conflict in Georgia in August 2008 serve to remind us of its continuing pertinence. The author sees modernisation of the system as essential.
European Security and Conventional Arms Control
The current state of the world is characterized by the geographical dispersion of the sources of power. These are predominantly states but also smaller (separatist regions or territories) and larger ones (alliances or international organizations). This results in the fragmentation and recombination of the political geography. Ownership of territory is necessary for political entities to provide military and economic security, political power or to confirm their identity. The definition of zones of influence and the positions of new frontiers change as a function of adjustments between the geopolitical ambitions of the various actors, oscillating between rivalry and cooperation.
In the twenty-first century, in order to navigate in a world in a state of flux, a geopolitical strategy is required, conceived as a spatiotemporal whole and functioning as a means of reducing others’ power. This is because the mastery of territory and time in the service of a political objective is a decisive advantage and a central element of sovereignty. This mastery depends on a capacity for appreciation of others’ space and time constraints.
Is it enough for the European Union (EU) to adopt a position as an ‘empire of standards’, in anticipation of the growing weight of the legal factor in international relations, in the face of the geopolitical doctrines of other political entities such as the United States, Russia, China and India, which are based on traditional power?
Il reste 92 % de l'article à lire





.jpg)



