Germany’s relationship with the Indo-Pacific is a multilayered story of colonial ambition, Cold-War division, economic interdependence, and twenty-first-century strategic recalibration. The nation’s past encounters continue to inform present policy, even as Germany confronts intensified Sino-American rivalry, shifting regional alliances, and the imperative to secure maritime supply routes. This paper will look at Germany’s engagement with the Indo-Pacific from past to present in an overview.

Germany’s contact with Asia and the Pacific began in the mid-nineteenth century, when Hamburg merchants, missionaries, and scientists sought opportunities from Samoa to Qingdao. By 1900 Berlin had accumulated a scattered but sizable colonial portfolio, which included German New Guinea, Samoa, Nauru, and leasehold Jiaozhou. It was administered through plantation capitalism, coercive labour regimes, and racially stratified legal systems that mirrored Europe’s competitive imperial order. These early engagements embedded German names in Pacific topography and German artifacts in regional museums, leaving a legacy still visible in contemporary restitution debates.

The First World War swiftly dismantled that empire: Australian, Japanese, and New Zealand forces occupied German possessions, and the Treaty of Versailles transferred them as League of Nations mandates. The Second World War’s end brought not only Germany’s military defeat but also its geopolitical division. In the Federal Republic, West German leadership aligned firmly with Washington, discreetly aiding the U.S. war effort in Vietnam and admitting refugees after Saigon’s fall, while East Germany cultivated limited worker-exchange programs with North Vietnam and maintained ideological solidarity with Pyongyang and Beijing. Neither German state possessed the blue-water capability to project power into the Pacific, but both quietly expanded trade with the “Asian Tigers”, slowly starting the economic post-Cold-War engagement. Reunification in 1990 and Asia’s growth boom soon transformed those relationships into dense commercial ties: by 2019, more than €210 billion in German exports flowed to Indo-Pacific markets.

By the early 2000s, Germany’s foreign policy establishment viewed the Indo-Pacific primarily through an economic lens. Chancellor Angela Merkel’s travels to Beijing, Delhi, and Tokyo were dominated by trade delegations, and naval operations remained peripheral. The 2004 tsunami relief mission offered an early glimpse of maritime activism, but genuine strategic thinking surfaced only after repeated debates on supply-chain vulnerability, cyber espionage, and China’s rapid naval expansion.

Strategic Realignment in the Twenty-First Century

Germany’s Indo-Pacific turning point came in September 2020, when the Cabinet adopted its “Indo-Pacific Leitlinien” a concise framework that wove together multilateralism, climate diplomacy, security cooperation, digital governance, and human-rights promotion. The document underscored a basic arithmetic: 40% of German external trade already traversed the region, so any disruption —be it from South China Sea blockades to piracy in the Malacca Strait— would have a direct impact on German factories and households.

Concrete follow-through soon followed. The frigate Bayern departed from the Northern German port Wilhelmshaven in August 2021 for a seven-month cruise that included port calls in Tokyo, Jakarta, Ho Chi Minh City, and Darwin, marking the first German naval presence east of Suez in more than a century. Although the ship avoided the Taiwan Strait, its transit near contested South China Sea reefs symbolized Berlin’s willingness to underscore freedom of navigation. Lessons learned fed the far larger 2024 Indo-Pacific Deployment: the frigate Baden-Württemberg, replenishment ship Frankfurt am Main, six Eurofighters, and A400M transport aircraft took part in multilateral exercises from Hawaii’s RIMPAC to Australia’s Pitch Black, demonstrating interoperability with U.S., Japanese, Australian, and ASEAN forces. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius publicly framed the mission as a pledge “to stand with partners in protecting the rules-based order”, a phrase that has become the rhetorical spine of Germany’s Asia strategy.

A partnership architecture evolved in parallel. Australia and Germany upgraded their 2013 Strategic Partnership to an Enhanced Strategic Partnership in June 2021, coupling joint submarine-rescue drills with cooperation on green hydrogen and critical minerals. Tokyo and Berlin held their first Inter-Governmental Consultations in March 2023, cementing agreements on classified-information protection, semiconductors, and quantum research, while staging trilateral air exercises alongside the U.S. Air Force. New Delhi, long paid attention to largely for market size, received escalated attention through the 2024 “Focus on India” strategy paper, which promises co-production of military hardware, easier mobility for engineers, and deeper collaboration on climate finance. Germany’s relationships with ASEAN, formalized through support for the COVID-19 Response Fund and capacity-building on maritime domain awareness, complete an complex and interlocking web of bilateral and regional engagement.

The most dramatic shift, however, concerns China. For decades Germany followed the approach “Wandel durch Handel” (change through trade), betting that trade would encourage political convergence. That assumption eroded as Beijing tightened control over Xinjiang, applied economic coercion to Lithuania, and accelerated naval modernization. In July 2023 the government released its first China Strategy, explicitly labelling the People’s Republic “partner, competitor, and systemic rival” while emphasizing “de-risking” rather than decoupling. The 61-page document warns that over-dependence on Chinese demand and inputs, whether in rare-earth magnets, photovoltaic modules, or medical glove moulds, constitutes a security liability. It signals that federal export guarantees will be withheld from projects raising human-rights red flags, a stance foreshadowed by the refusal to underwrite Volkswagen’s Xinjiang expansion. The strategy also stresses monitoring tensions in the Taiwan Strait, supporting regional resilience, and coordinating with EU mechanisms such as investment screening and the anti-coercion instrument.

Think tanks have dissected both Leitlinien and China Strategy with mixed outcomes. The Swedish FOI praises Germany’s hard-power signalling but warns that single-ship deployments cannot substitute for persistent presence. DGAP analysts argue that Berlin’s civilian-power identity complicates its ability to threaten force credibly, while MERICS notes private-sector reluctance to curtail Chinese exposure despite rhetorical alignment with de-risking. Nonetheless, the cumulative effect is unmistakable: Germany has moved from passive commercialism to a more holistic, albeit still cautious, grand strategy that blends normative advocacy with pragmatic diversification.

Perhaps the most symbolically significant moment came in September 2024, when the frigate Baden-Württemberg and replenishment ship Frankfurt am Main transited the Taiwan Strait for the first time since 2002—defying Chinese warnings and signalling Berlin’s commitment to freedom of navigation in international waters. Defence Minister Pistorius defended the passage with a clear statement: “International waters are international waters, it is the shortest route, it is the safest route given the weather conditions.” Chinese military spokespersons condemned the transit as provocative, but German naval commanders reported professional interactions with shadowing People’s Liberation Army Navy vessels.

Analytical Assessment and Future Trajectories

From Samoan plantations and Qingdao’s beer-brewing streets to Eurofighter flyovers above the Coral Sea, Germany’s Indo-Pacific story spans colonization, cataclysm, division, and renewal. Historical entanglements shape contemporary sensitivities: Berlin’s restitution debates echo colonial expropriations, and its wary stance toward great-power rivalry reflects lessons of twentieth-century devastation. In today’s strategic environment, Germany seeks equilibrium: sufficient military presence to deter coercion, diversified partnerships to cushion supply shocks, and multilateral forums to embed its normative preferences.

The 2020 Indo-Pacific Leitlinien and 2023 China Strategy represent inflection points in post-war German foreign policy, marking Berlin’s recognition that Asia-Pacific dynamics now directly affect European security and prosperity. Unlike the imperial ventures before World War I or the ideological posturing of the Cold War, contemporary German engagement emphasizes multilateral legitimacy, rules-based frameworks, and collaborative capacity-building with regional partners. The Enhanced Strategic Partnership with Australia exemplifies this approach: combining hydrogen supply chains with submarine rescue exercises, renewable energy cooperation with intelligence sharing, and climate diplomacy with joint naval patrols.

However, significant challenges remain. Germany’s naval capabilities, while symbolically important, cannot match the sustained presence maintained by the United States, Japan, or even France and Britain. The Bundeswehr’s commitment to European defence following Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine limits resources available for Indo-Pacific operations, forcing Germany to choose between competing strategic priorities. More fundamentally, Germany’s export-dependent economy remains vulnerable to supply-chain disruptions and market access restrictions, whether imposed by Beijing or arising from regional conflicts.

Taiwan is particularly important. While the September 2024 strait transit demonstrated symbolic resolve, a genuine crisis would test Germany’s willingness to accept economic costs in defence of abstract principles. Unlike Australia or Japan, Germany lacks direct security exposure to Chinese military expansion, making sustained public support for confrontational policies more difficult to maintain. The China Strategy’s emphasis on “de-risking” rather than “decoupling” reflects this tension, acknowledging interdependence while attempting to reduce vulnerabilities through supply-chain diversification and technological sovereignty.

Germany’s partnerships with Japan and India illustrate both opportunities and limitations in its Indo-Pacific strategy. The Japan-Germany Inter-Governmental Consultations, launched in March 2023, have produced concrete agreements on economic security, semiconductor cooperation, and defence technology sharing. Joint exercises between the German and Japanese air forces demonstrate growing operational interoperability, while bilateral research programs in quantum computing and artificial intelligence position both countries to compete with China in critical technologies. Similarly, the “Focus on India” strategy paper, adopted in October 2024, recognizes New Delhi’s growing importance as a counterweight to Chinese influence and a potential partner in defence co-production, green hydrogen development, and talent mobility.

Whether this balancing and hedging act endures, will depend on domestic political resolve, European solidarity, and the development of Sino-American relations. The September 2024 Bundestag elections strengthened parties favouring more assertive China policies, suggesting public support for strategic reorientation. At the European level, Germany’s approach increasingly aligns with Brussels’ own shift toward “strategic autonomy” and economic security, creating momentum for coordinated policies on investment screening, critical raw materials, and technology transfer restrictions. The challenge lies in maintaining this consensus through potential economic downturns, supply-chain disruptions, or regional crises that test the costs of confronting China.

Looking ahead, Germany’s Indo-Pacific engagement will likely deepen gradually rather than transformatively. Regular naval deployments, expanding intelligence sharing with regional partners, and growing participation in multilateral exercises signal institutionalization of Germany’s presence, while trade diversification and supply-chain resilience measures reduce vulnerabilities to economic coercion. The ultimate test, however, will come during crises that force the German government to choose between commercial interests and security commitments. Whether Germany can sustain its evolving strategy through such challenges will determine not only its own role in the Indo-Pacific order but also Europe’s capacity to function as a genuine global actor rather than merely an economic space.

Germany is no longer a distant bystander like in the past. It is now an engaged, if still learning, stakeholder in the Indo-Pacific order it first entered more than 150 years ago. The arc from colonial expansion through ideological division to contemporary strategic partnerships illustrates both the persistence of German interests in the Indo-Pacific and the evolving means through which those interests are pursued. In an era of intensifying great-power competition, Germany’s success in balancing engagement with deterrence, economic opportunity with security imperatives, and national interests with multilateral cooperation will significantly influence the future shape of Indo-Pacific geopolitics.

References

Auswärtiges Amt, “The Indo-Pacific region” (https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

Stewart Firth, “Germany’s Asia-Pacific Empire: Colonialism and Naval Policy, 1885-1914”, Germany’s Asia-Pacific Empire, Boydell Press, 2016, p 34-67.

German Historical Institute Washington, “Germans in the Asia-Pacific Region: (Post) Colonial Entanglements, Conflicts, and Perceptions in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries” (www.ghi-dc.org/).

Stanzel Angela, “Germany’s Strategic Vision for the Indo-Pacific”, Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA, March 3^rd 2022 (https://spfusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Dr.-Angela-Stanzel-Paper.pdf).

Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, “Germany and the Indo-Pacific” (https://www.kas.de/).

Bundesregierung, “German government adopts guidelines for the Indo-Pacific region”, September 2^nd 2020 (https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/service/archive/indo-pacific-1781916).

Auswärtiges Amt, “Policy guidelines for the Indo-Pacific” September 1^st 2020 (www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

Bundeswehr, “Indo-Pacific Deployment 2024” (www.bundeswehr.de/).

Marineforum Online, “German warships navigate the Taiwan Strait”, September 15^th 2024 (https://marineforum.online/en/german-warships-sail-the-taiwan-strait/).

Bundeswehr, “German Navy begins Indo-Pacific Deployment 2024”, May 8^th 2024 (https://www.bundeswehr.de/).

Auswärtiges Amt, “An Enhanced Strategic Partnership with Australia”, June 10^th 2021 (www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “Joint Statement 1^st Japan-Germany Inter-Governmental Consultations”, March 18^th 2023 (https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100476976.pdf).

Auswärtiges Amt, “The German Government adopts Focus on India paper”, October 16^th 2024 (https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/aussenpolitik/focus-on-india-2680284).

Auswärtiges Amt, “Progress report on the implementation of the Federal Government’s policy guidelines for the Indo-Pacific”, September 25^th 2024 (www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

DGAP, “Germany’s New China Strategy: Following Brussels”, July 20^th 2023 (https://dgap.org/).

Auswärtiges Amt, “Strategy on China” July 13^th 2023 (www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

European Institute for Asian Studies, “Germany’s New China Strategy and its Implications for EU-China Relations”, August 4^th 2023 (https://eias.org/).

Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), “Germany in the Indo-Pacific”, FOI Memo 8746, 2024 (www.foi.se/).

DGAP, “Germany’s New China Strategy: Following Brussels”, MERICS, “China-Politik verankern: Die unterschätzte Rolle des Bundestags bei der Gestaltung deutsch-chinesischer Beziehungen”, December 8^th 2022 (https://merics.org/).

“German navy vessels sail through Taiwan Strait”, Deutsche Welle, September 13^th 2024 (www.dw.com/).

USNI News, “German Navy Asserts Freedom of Navigation During Pacific Deployment, Says Admiral”, October 9^th 2024 (https://news.usni.org/).

Auswärtiges Amt, “Enhanced Strategic Partnership between Australia and the Federal Republic of Germany”, June 2021 (www.auswaertiges-amt.de/).

DGAP, “Security Risks in the Indo-Pacific: Why Germany Needs to Cooperate More Closely with Partners in the Region”, Policy Brief n° 21, October 2024 (https://dgap.org/).

Government of Japan, “Japan-Germany Summit Meeting”, August 23^rd 2024 (www.japan.go.jp/).

“The Indo-Pacific Region in the Agenda of Germany’s Coalition Government”, The Diplomat, April 15^th 2025 (https://thediplomat.com/2025/04/the-indo-pacific-region-in-the-agenda-of-germanys-coalition-government/).